A shower stall that could be placed in the lab. Not necessarily one with walls, just a pipe sticking up out of a platform, One with a detachable hose to spray down the subjects.

This suggestion is made with the assumption that cum that lands on the body will stay on the body until washed out or forcefully unloaded by system restrictions.

The shower stall could also be used as a bondage rack, for scrub play, and temperature play.

Alternate options to shower stalls could be shower heads that could be placed on the walls, ceilings and floors. Which are controlled by a control panel.

Here is a troublesome topic: Fek wants to include human characters in R2ck and I think he once said he cannot keep anybody from creating really small characters.

To evade legal trouble I want to suggest to ban characters with certain attributes to be uploaded to RackNET to not step into a grayzone of distributing child pornography. Nobody wants to end up with such stuff on his computer.

Combinations like:

- Small

- Human

- Vagina / small dick

- Flat chest

Should be easy to auto recognise and ban from upload.

I would go as far as disallowing such combinations per se ingame, but at least don't have it shareable on RackNET, it is a huge legal risk for Fek and for those who for whatever reason have such a character offered on client selection.

This sadly is not a far fetched concern. See this case http://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-12-08/fake-simpsons-cartoon-is-child-porn-judge-rules/233562

probably a long shot (and most likely not something to add until the game is already done) but maybe add a bit of "off the clock" fun like maybe add a nightclub, shopping center where you can meet npcs (and pick up some new threads) and maybe even an apartment you can head back for some less sciency action sometimes? (or just bring them to the office as a volunteer)

The ability to enter first-person mode when interacting with a test subject. You could have control of the hand and head with a key, such as Caps, to switch between them.

Currently (unless I am mistaken) one must hold down the left mouse button to perform actions when interacting with test subjects. Releasing the button immediately cancels the action.

I propose an option to allow a click to begin the action with another click to cancel the action so that left click (or the assigned button) must not be continually held down lest the action be cancelled.

This suggestion's approval or dismissal is meant to be about simply the idea of interaction without constant user input. The following examples are just chatter on the subject that goes much further, but all would require the ability to continue an action without continuous input.

Perhaps going further holding down the button (or another input method) could allow recording of movements to be repeated until cancelled. If various parts could act independently this would also allow multiple actions if appropriate animations existed, such as fingering an anus while performing oral interaction or other combinations with reasonably feasible animation.

This topic is a rather advanced idea on the subject related to toys/machines, but I am also talking about player character actions:

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/256-programmable-machinestoys/

Taken perhaps too ambitiously such a system would allow quite a bit of customized automation if a gambit-like system were possible with the player character as well as machines/toys. At its most simple though, this suggestion is just to offer the option to not require holding down a button at all times.

It's the only thing I'm missing from my sona, and I know a lot of other people have them on their drakes. Would look similar to this image by Morca:

Source: Vindictus

Source: Guild Wars 2

I'm pretty sure of copyrights, those images are just examples.

Use current in-game client characters that generate as test subjects or some future variation such as appointments made with Dr. PlayerCharacter to have various modifications done to their body. Might work best in an active feedback situation in a testing room, or perhaps a check list (objectives?) to meet their demands prior to credits given. Maybe give bonus credits for exceeding expectations but not going beyond client limits.

There should at some point DEFINITELY be an easier way to cum on your subjects, by grasping yourself during orgasm perhaps.