Your comments

interesting idea, but if you will get husky in game you can apply its parts on lynx yourself, game allow this ;3

and next pokemon topic to collection its around 5 of them already sonic is kinda new but situation similliar

i'll just copy post i made yesterday on other pokemon topic its exacly same situation:


No, Pokemons Digimons or anything else copyrighted can't be in a game as an official species and what is even worse Pokemon is owned by Nintendo known for shuting down any project related to their licences.


Only thing you can do is modify them into game and to be honest i wouldn't be suprised if they are modded already, just look at this Krystal fan made model modded into a game i found on "U-18Chan" topic about rack 2, from this to Lucario is not a long way ;3.


modding community is already busy they started making whole new species like for example Pig, or new mechanics-adjustments like this example. only thing we need now is modding center sebsite to place them and download them from there


also other Pokemon related topics

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/550-dragons-or-pokemon-like-vaporeon-as-feral-or-lucario-as-anthro/

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/383-pokemon-pokemorphs/

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/160-braixen/

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/603-pokemons-specificly-gardevoir-for-female-and-lucario-for-male/

here we go again....


No, Pokemons Digimons or anything else copyrighted can't be in a game as an official species and what is even worse Pokemon is owned by Nintendo known for shuting down any project related to their licences.


Only thing you can do is modify them into game and to be honest i wouldn't be suprised if they are modded already, just look at this Krystal fan made model modded into a game i found on "U-18Chan" topic about rack 2, from this to Lucario is not a long way ;3.


modding community is already busy they started making whole new species like for example Pig, or new mechanics-adjustments like this example. only thing we need now is modding center sebsite to place them and download them from there


also other Pokemon related topics

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/550-dragons-or-pokemon-like-vaporeon-as-feral-or-lucario-as-anthro/

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/383-pokemon-pokemorphs/

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/160-braixen/

topic already made, its exacly the same species, starbound is simply one of places where this species can be found

http://fek.userecho.com/topics/585-avali/


you are 5 days and 40-50 likes late ;3

24h and this topic already have 17/1 likes well it will have 200 likes much sooner than expected ;D

likes? it have 6 likes in 8 hours i would say it will have around 200 at end of a year.

i seen many topics that don't have that many likes and dislikes combined and was created long ago ;3


its safe to tell that it would pass:

  • cute as **** species looking almost like from AAA game
  • in game propably cutest thing we have is a mouse
  • in game we don't have many avians
  • this eyes my good...
  • this tail, i want this tail in game with species or not o_0
  • cute ears
  • they would fit perfectly as a Pokemon species

they are nimbats level of cute and nimbats have 12 likes even it there is told they CAN'T be in a game ;3


lets be honest, who would disslike them if i could i would liked it a lot more times


but you have done one mistake, you should insert one image into topic not everyone will go into link so you will miss some likes that way, well i'll add one image for you, every like count <3



well yes he aggreed that they can be in normal games but porn can be seen otherwise by him, not everyone would like to see their child to be in porn ;3

you point about consent is correct and i aggree with it we are taking about real word, but not exacly in furry fandom, in this fandom everything depends on author, if he make ferals consent they are consent, look at pokemon as en exampe they are mostly official consent and thinking ferals,most of them are 4 or 5 at image in my previous post, it depends on fek and maybe this topic how they will be in game (if will be anyway) and thats why i was asking to explain me what is not liked about my idea, i am only one person many of you have your own opinions problems and sugestions on this topic.;3


if you have problem simply with anthro-feral there can always be reproduction made by mating two of same species animals for example two wild cats in their habitat.


and to be honest i never imagined it as rape thing, and as rape it can't even be in a game (exacly same list you were pointing earlier) so i think this version we have out of our minds if even anthro-feral would exist it would need to be willing on both sides, maybe giving our feral a goody would make them more friendly and willing to us and make it possible only with "friendly" ferals, more gameplay good on ethics;3


and about development time, yes i know it will take time but not as much as skeleton thing and can be done really late in development after main game and most of common fetishes (or most liked) are finished or are near finishing


also i have some experience in game programming not that big its just a hobby for me and it simply don't need that many things to do, habitats can be script copy of each other, and have 2-4 places for play things (not sex, simply play for example climbing tree for cats) with simple hard codded animations, our feral would walk random between them on habitat, mating is another static animations, imagine it as cutscene with camera we can control. in comparison to main game it would be propably on difficulty of one of main systems for example on research difficulty or maybe little bigger on amount of work (models can take some time sadly so better would be to have same type of animals as simple reskins of each other, (tiger/lion etc)


i don't think it need ass many polished and parts as main game its side activity not whole second game ;)


and to be honest, i am happy to talk with you, not everyone needs to like same fetishes but everyone like/dislike counts so our chat can make few more likes for this topic by side effect or at least few less dislikes also its only topic i seen where almost all posts are long like an essay

avali is a community project but have a pseudo official mod, it is possible but it propably would need agreement from autor if there is someone like that, hard to tell from wiki you send, i simply don't see any licence info ;3


i would be really happy to see that in a game.


also, amount of concept art will be helpfull for fek ;3

1. i know it but he also told on exaly same website why, and on this explaination i base my idea, this explaining is on bottom of post but lets short it by saying that: he won't add them as a working SPECIES but will allow them in other way that don't need working skeleton so for example hard codded or static animations without skeleton, thats exacly what i posted and pointed in first post

"[...]impossible is to get in game species like taur, mermaid or feral as fully functioning in main activity but many of us likes idea of them being in game,[...]"


2. lets be honest all furry fandom is bestiality and all that different us is that anthro stand on 2 not 4 legs ;3

feral and anthro are not that different and have many forms, some more natural in looking some of them looks almost like anthro on 4 legs. or feral on 2 legs, simply look at this, where do you stop? ;3



i would say that game operate at "3" but would allow with skeletons 1 and 2, 4 and 5 need different systems because their body proportions.

and i tell it one more time, it will be SIDE activity any of you that don't like this don't need to ever use it. and game have option to disable some things so you can't even accidentaly come into it, downvoting becose you don't like ferals is just rude ;D...


3. as i told i don't wont it as a normal and functioning species but as side activity, i also pointed that "[...]cross-breeding could have 1-3 simple animations[...]" so it will not be a skeleton based, in simple words much less work and with accord with game faq


4. you thought i posted idea that i wanted simply a feral species as normal species, nope i want them as not animation connected side activity, different thing ;3


short story, i am trying to bypass problem with skeletons of main game with metod that will take not that much work as making whole new skeletons for every feral cathegory (amount of work for that... jesus) and will allow ferals to appear in game in somehow lore friendly way benefiting main gameplay way with optional money and research resources making option.


and for last ty for reply, i am just pointing some things to clear your thinking but after checking all 4 points you posted it went back all circle to "i don't like ferals" and some lack of understanding of the topic meybe you read only title not post ;3.


PS. i know what is on Furry.science and more than one time i was using it in other topics, there is a chance that this list seen was posted by me ;3


http://furry.science
Why no feral/taur support?
The game is built around a single animation skeleton that is shared by every character in the game, a massive library of programmatic animations for that skeleton, as well as a single bank of body parts that are designed to snap into place with each other on top of that skeleton.

This system allows a pretty good amount of flexibility, but it only supports characters that stand on two legs and adhere to the rough shape of the skeleton. In order to support feral / taur characters, I would need to create (and maintain) an alternate skeleton, an alternate set of programmatic animations, and an alternate library of body parts for each.

This would effectively mean building an entire second game from scratch. The only parts of the game I'd be able to reuse for ferals/taurs are the pleasure/orgasm mechanics and things like movement, dialogue, inventory, etc.

It's simply too much work. There might eventually be some sort of hard-coded interaction that caters to the feral/ taur crowd, but feral characters will not be fully supported.